Payments and risk benchmarks explain how shoppers pay online and how payment friction affects conversion. This silo groups the most cited
payment mix metrics and local method examples used in e-commerce reporting and research.
Back to the hub:
E-commerce Statistics.
If you only publish two pages first, start with
payment methods share
and BLIK share in Poland.
Featured (start here)
Payment mix benchmarks and a high-signal local method case study.
Payment methods share
Global payment method mix benchmarks (wallets, cards, bank transfer) with consistent “share” definition.
BLIK share in Poland
Poland-specific benchmark and scale metrics for a dominant local payment method.
Payment method fit is a common driver in abandonment research. Pair with
cart abandonment.
Pages in this silo
Prepared links so you won’t need to edit this silo later as pages go live.
- Payment methods share
- BLIK share in Poland
- Digital wallet share (e-commerce)
- Credit card share (e-commerce)
- Debit card share (e-commerce)
- Bank transfer share (e-commerce)
- Cash on delivery share (e-commerce)
- BNPL share (e-commerce)
- Payment failure rate benchmarks
- Chargeback rate benchmarks
- Fraud rate benchmarks (e-commerce)
How to use payments benchmarks
A checklist that keeps “payment share” claims citable and comparable.
- Define “share”. Use share of transaction value or share of transactions—don’t mix.
- State the scope. Retail-only vs broader e-commerce panels can change method shares.
- Add a local method example. Use market-specific datasets (e.g., BLIK in Poland) for sharper narratives.
- Connect to conversion. Payment friction affects abandonment and conversion outcomes.
Reference pages:
Methodology •
Glossary •
Sources